I was experimenting with pydoc yesterday, and was baffled by how it was running. Turns out Mac OS X does some tricky stuff to support multiple versions of Python.
If you type "pydoc" at a shell prompt, it works properly:
pydoc - the Python documentation tool
pydoc.py <name> ...
Show text documentation on something. <name> may be the name of a
If you ask which file is being run, it's /usr/bin/pydoc, and you can look at that file:
$ which pydoc
$ more /usr/bin/pydoc
import sys, os
import glob, re
partA = """\
python version %d.%d.%d can't run %s. Try the alternative(s):
partB = """
Run "man python" for more information about multiple version support in
Mac OS X.
sys.stderr.write(partA % (sys.version_info[:3] + (sys.argv,)))
Notice that this file will always write "python version X.Y.Z can't run...," which is not the output we're getting. Weird!
(BTW, if you have activated a virtualenv, you may have an alias, so that "pydoc" is actually "python -m pydoc". Is there an equivalent to "which" that will include that fact it in its output?)
But even without the virtualenv alias, this file isn't being run. Why not? The answer is in the shebang line:
Unix uses the shebang line to find a program to run the file. So typing "pydoc" at the prompt will find /usr/bin/pydoc, then find the shebang line, and will actually run this:
Seems simple enough: invoke Python, and have it run the code in /usr/bin/pydoc. So why isn't Python running the Python code we saw? The answer is that /usr/bin/python is not a Python interpreter!
On OS X, /usr/bin/python examines various settings and then invokes a real Python interpreter of the correct version: python.1 man page. A quick look at the readable text inside the executable confirms that it is not a full interpreter, and that it is concerned with versions:
$ strings /usr/bin/python
%s environment variable error (ignored)
no user %d
%s: too long
%s: Can't append "%s"
Executable path too long
alloca: out of memory
realpath couldn't resolve "%s"
%s: Can't append "%s"
posix_spawnattr_setbinpref_np only copied %d of %d
%s -> %s
versionarg: Out of memory
read_plist: %s: open
read_plist: %s: stat
read_plist: %s: mmap
read_plist: %s: CFDataCreateWithBytesNoCopy failed
(cfstrdup also failed)
read_plist: %s: CFPropertyListCreateFromXMLData failed: %s
read_plist: %s: plist not a dictionary
read_plist: %s: Prefer-32-Bit not a boolean
read_plist: %s: %s: Version unknown
read_plist: %s: Version not a string
So this finder is given "/usr/bin/pydoc" as an argument, and it decides what to really run. It's special-casing "/usr/bin", and actually invoking /usr/bin/pydoc2.7. The real /usr/bin/pydoc file is there only to be executed when the version-selection mechanism fails, which is why it simply prints messages about not being able to find the right version.
It seems that the switcher doesn't care much what command you're trying to run. If it's in /usr/bin, and there's a file alongside it with the same name but the current Python version appended, then it will run the versioned one.
All this can be verified by an experiment. I created /usr/bin/foo with these contents:
print sys.argv, "Plain!"
and a /usr/bin/foo2.7 with this:
print sys.argv, "Versioned!"
Then I ran it a number of different ways (the current directory is in the prompt):
~ $ foo
~ $ /usr/bin/foo
~ $ foo2.7
~ $ /usr/bin/foo2.7
~ $ cd /usr/bin
/usr/bin $ foo
/usr/bin $ foo2.7
/usr/bin $ ./foo
Notice that the Python switcher runs the versioned file whenever it's identified as being from /usr/bin. But when run so that the shell doesn't identify it that way, even when it's the exact same file, the Python switcher decides it shouldn't interfere, and it runs the exact file specified.