Saturday 20 September 2008 — This is 16 years old. Be careful.
I’ve just bought a new car: a Honda Civic hybrid. I don’t buy cars that often. The car I just replaced was a 1994 Civic. To keep the same pace, I’ll add an entry to my calendar for 2022 to buy my next car.
I like the Civic for its gas mileage, 45 mpg highway. The extra expense over a non-hybrid Civic is actually more than I’ll save on gas over the life of the car, but I like being the change I want to see in the world.
One thing that surprised me about this car is how familiar it felt after having driven a 1994 Civic. Lots of extra bells and whistles that I’d gotten used to in my wife’s larger cars are still absent in this car.
Features in the hybrid I didn’t have in my 1994 Civic (other than the hybrid engine):
- A temperature setting in the climate control
- Front seat map lights
- A chime to alert me that I’ve left my headlights on
- An auxiliary jack for the stereo
- Electronic dashboard with thermometer, etc
Things that work in the hybrid that used to work in the 1994 Civic, but no longer do:
- Remote entry buttons
- Reliable low-speed wipers
- Rear left passenger door handle
- Exhaust system. The last thing that failed on the 94 was the exhaust. For its last two days, it sounded like a four-door Harley.
Fancy features the Hybrid doesn’t have that my wife’s car does:
- Motorized seat adjustments with memory
- Heated seats
- Lighted mirrors in visors
- Fold-in side mirrors
- Leather seats
- Separate temperature settings for driver and passenger
- Individual lights for rear passengers
I’m pleased to have a new car that just works, and especially one that does so well on gas.
Comments
This is the single missing feature that annoyed me the MOST about the old Civics. How much could the chime have cost them to add? I ran down my battery more than once due to this omission. Glad to see they've fixed that. Enjoy the new car!
I'm of mixed emotions about hybrid vehicles. Are they actually the right answer to the big-picture problems, or are they merely an opiate that let's us ignore the issues for a little while longer?
Assuming for the moment that we can make every vehicle on the road today (urr... actually, everywhere we use gasoline) 2-3x more efficient, than we are still only back to 1970-1980's levels of gas consumption. It's a good start, but demand will continue to increase due to emerging markets like China and India. Meanwhile, we are close to the period of Peak Oil production, even by most optimistic estimates. So it's not at all clear to me that this results in any significant change.
I'm not an all-electric vehicle zealot by any means and, especially when the power for them comes from coal or oil power plants. Their biggest advantage would seem to be that they are highly adaptable in where the power for them comes from, be it nuclear, hydro/thermo-electric, solar, or wind. In a future where there looks to be a lot of chaos and uncertainty about where our nation will be getting it's power (read, "oil") from, this could prove to be tremendously important.
Speaking of which, I find it rather amusing that the Model-T was the first "Flex Fuel" vehicle. Amazing how far we've come in 100 years, eh? :-P
[Disclosure: My wife and I drive a combined ~15K miles/year in our two Honda Elements (23-25 MPG).]
Once we just drove cars. Then we got V-6's and V-8's. Then we got seat belts. Then we got SUVs. And Passenger Airbags. And Cell phones. And crumple zones.....
Death rate is still 40K/yr US. Hovers at 42 +/- 10%
I say let's cut the crap out of cars again and you'll see gas mileage improve again. I can adjust my seat and open windows manually just fine and I bet that's what Keith did on his 80s Toyota Corolla, too. Also, you don't need a sedan or SUV that weighs 2000 pounds. Even if you're a soccer mom. My mom took my sisters and me to school in a VW Polo (the Golf's smaller brother) and I grew up just fine.
Btw, when it comes to shape, we're still far from building aerodynamic cars. The Audi A2 and the Toyota Prius are world leaders here (drag coefficients of 0.25 and 0.26, respectively) and when you look at them, you'll see why: they're much more shaped like a water drop than your average sedan or hatchback.
I have 2000 Civic that regular gives me 36-37 MPG, but I am hanging on for the new Honda Insight.
I'd love to see a comparison of the pollution generated by a diesel (manufacturing and usage) vs. the same factors in a hybrid. I've seen a lot of talk about polution generated from the battery manufacturing process.
One thing I have noticed on the Civic: when I am using cruise control on the interstate at highway speeds (65-70), the CVT runs the engine up to quite high rpms on hills -- like sometimes 4500 +. This is around Atlanta, so it's not like we are climbing the Alps. Anyone else experienced this?
The Prius did not do this.
have a Honda Civic Hybrid 2007. I have much difficulty driving in snow.
The car "floats" -- it is difficult to keep on the road. No one dares
drive over 45. Does anyone else have this problem? Any suggestions?
have a Honda Civic Hybrid 2007. I have much difficulty driving in snow.
The car "floats" -- it is difficult to keep on the road. No one dares
drive over 45. Does anyone else have this problem? Any suggestions?
Same with my Honda Civic 2003 where I had to buy a new one at carstuff(http://www.car-stuff.com/hoodmolding.htm) my question is that does Honda provide additional information on the after-market parts by Replacement?
Add a comment: