Wednesday 6 August 2008 — This is more than 16 years old. Be careful.
Barack Obama suggested that people properly inflate their tires and tune up their cars to help reduce oil consumption. John McCain ridiculed him for it and said we need to start off-shore drilling. Why do people so easily laugh off the idea of maintaining your car as a way to use less gas?
As Time magazine points out, tire gauges are a good solution:
The Bush Administration estimates that expanded offshore drilling could increase oil production by 200,000 barrels per day by 2030. We use about 20 million barrels per day, so that would meet about 1% of our demand two decades from now. Meanwhile, efficiency experts say that keeping tires inflated can improve gas mileage 3%, and regular maintenance can add another 4%. Many drivers already follow their advice, but if everyone did, we could immediately reduce demand several percentage points. In other words: Obama is right.
And don’t forget that time line: offshore drilling would take ten years before it changed anything, while we can immediately begin using less gas now with simple maintenance. Heck, if need be, do both. But what’s so funny about maintaining your car?
Everyone knows these tips: drive slower, inflate your tires, tune up your car, you’ll have better efficiency right away. If the experts’ estimates are right, you can immediately use 5% less gas. Put another way, pay 20 cents less per gallon.
Why do people find this so ridiculous? Americans, especially voters being pitched during an election year, want big actions, not tweaks. Any idea that includes “less” or “smaller” or “work” is ridiculed as somehow eating into our way of life. And as much as people cry out for personal responsibility, they don’t want to get their hands dirty checking their tire pressure.
Shop around for cheaper gas? OK. Use a little less, even if it doesn’t mean driving less? No thanks. Sheesh...
Comments
Inflating tires will not erase the 100-200$ per month extra a family spends in fuel. Nor will it ease the high food prices caused by the ethanol scam. Nor will it cause countries like China and India who use more oil every day. There is nothing ignorant about pointing this out.
There is no reason Congress should stop anyone from drilling or building refineries. Its no business of Congress in the first place(well offshore maybe but not domestic drilling); see Article X of the Constitution.
That said, I keep my tires inflated.
Obama's solution involves raiding our 401k accounts in the guise of 'windfall profits' tax and redistributing it to people who didn't earn it.
Here's a really great article on what offshore drilling would really get us (summary: practically no impact, maybe 1% of our oil needs)
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/06/20/new_offshore_drilling_not_a_quick_fix_analysts_say/
We need to reduce our use of fossil fuels, not find more of them. Americans have reduced their driving by something like 3% from last year, and GM's SUV production has been drastically cut due to Americans choosing to buy smaller, more fuel efficient cars. That alone has made a bigger impact than offshore drilling ever could.
We need to find more ways to reduce our reliance on ALL oil, not just foreign. And the crazy thing is, we already have everything we need - wind power, solar power, hydro power, and even nuclear power. If we put half as much money into developing renewable energy sources as we put into funding the oil business, we'd all have solar panels on our roofs by now.
But we don't have to wait for the government to do it for us. Every one of us can take a few easy steps to largely reduce our reliance on oil, and most of them will save you money, too. Buy a car with 5 more MPG than your current car. Change all your light bulbs out with compact fluorescent bulbs. Buy more local food. And yes, keep your car well maintained.
As for blaming India and China - the US imports more than DOUBLE the oil that India and China do, *put together*. And given that the population of the US is 1/8th of those two countries, that means that per person, we're importing SIXTEEN TIMES the amount of oil. So... whose fault are the high prices again?
http://multicodecjukebox.blogspot.com/2008/05/crude-oil-demand-india-china-and-usa.html
As far as the 'analysts' go, I would say if we can put a man on the moon in 6 years we can increase domestic oil production better than 1% of our usages. The market should be dictating production and not Congress.
PS. If offshore drilling is so unprofitable, why are Brazil, Mexico and China doing it?
Who are we kidding? Look at all the SUVs on the street, the new cars, huge mansions ... the only pain I see is the one that we cause to the global economy. As gay marriage was the top "issue" in 2004 I see another pointless and meaningless issue topping the agenda this year. Boy how pathetic it is.
And there is an easy solution to it all. Stop using so much gas. That will ease the price of gas immensely. But of course that requires some change of habits. And change is the most difficult, it is you who needs to change not someone else. Even a minute changes in driving habits will add up to more than all the pointless drivel from both candiadtes (did you know people drove 10 billion less miles in 2008?).
Laziness, of course. Maintaining your car takes effort, but it's somebody else who's doing the drilling.
It unfortunately reminds me of the movie "Idiocracy." I envision McCain following up Obama's statement, laughing like Beavis and Butthead and saying "...you talk like a fag, and your shit's all retarded..."
maybe im wrong.
Bush could have called Americans to action after 9/11, but he let his opportunity pass. I think President Obama will lead by promoting national voluntary efforts to conserve energy and invest in alternative sources.
But I will provide the one piece that puts deep doubt into Obama's comments. Tune ups. Modern vehicles today rarely need a tune up. Vehicles today use computer managed ignition, not points and condensers that wore out in old cars. What is generally replaced if at all is vulnerable rubber ignition cables. Some vehicles where access to the plugs are a problem use platinum plugs that can go 200k miles without being touched. Even a plain plug in a managed ignition system goes 50k-100k. That is about the practical life the the original buyer owns the car before selling it.
Nor do I think it would take 22 years to get additional oil in the OCS online. The Bush estimate also applied the std regulatory drag to the estimate. Fast track the regulatory barriers and you could bring that delivery horizon to about 5-6 years. Nor are the estimates for ANWR accurate. From the proposed field to Pudrue Bay is 70 miles. The entire 800 pipeline was done in 6 years. We can't lay 70 miles of pipe using the existing plans in 2? Hard to believe. Not only that but I have seen oil platforms here in Texas go from flat ground to drilling in 2 weeks. If its not a dry hole to producing in a month.
Just observing.
The other problem I see is the number of people who drive gas guzzling SUV's and pickup trucks when they don't use them for what they are intended (a truck with a perfect paint job and no scratches in the bed is not getting used as it was intended). We need to get out of the mindset that cars are a status symbol and get into the mindset of buying for what we need.
Conservation is good but it is imperfect. One of the things I like about CFLs is that I can leave them on all the time, and for cheap! I drive Boston => Philly => Boston about once a month. I can either make the 660 mile round trip in 9 hrs at 30MPG or 12 hours at 35MPG. I choose 30MPG (traffic permitting). It costs me an extra $10 but saves three hours.
Conservationists send an off putting sackcloth and ashes message which doesn't help their cause. Many "conservation" measures are about conspicuous acts and not dictionary definition conservation. NYC spends $100 million a year on curbside recycling because the value of what it collects is far less than what it costs to collect it. Compare that to the local scrapyard where they pay you to bring in stuff (seriously, go visit a scrapyard. It has big trucks, cranes, and other fun stuff). How many acres of land could be bought and left fallow with all that recycling money? How much gas would be saved by having only one truck make the rounds instead of two? But any city government that cut recycling would be lynched by well meaning greens.
I understand the need to stay on message but why pick "inflate your tires" instead of "drive a manual," or "use less heat/AC" instead of "get a roommate" (get married, it's good for the environment!)?
Any calls for collectivism (see Josh's comment) poison the message for a large percent of the population.
* Most people, I did know a girl who received a rude shock after college. She had no idea cars needed oil - her father had been changing it silently for years. Two years (!) after she got her own place her engine seized up, dry as a bone.
His implication is that we would get the equivalent of oil drilling by pumping up tires. But run the numbers. The US runs 8.7m bbl a day for transport. Assuming a generous 3% increase in mileage that's 70m a year for a 270 work year. A good number but is dwarfed by the 2.4B bbl we use.
The Brazilians just discovered a 30B reserve off their OCS. We may expect just as much off ours. Some are saying there is a 100B deposit in OCS of the Polar ice cap. Obama's numbers are fanciful as a defined solution.
The funny irony is the latest quip from Paris Hilton makes more sense than either McCain or Obama. We have to do all of it. Conserve, nukes, drill, solar and wind.
The Real Price of Gasoline is a 10 year old report on all the costs taxpayers bear for gas that, if anything, is truer today than it was when it was published. Executive summary: We are paying $7.50-$20/gallon (inflation adjusted to 2008) for gas already. We just don't realize it.
Not only does this create a completely out-of-whack supply/demand curve for vehicles (hello, Hummer!), it creates a totally unnecessary volatility in pump prices. For example, say the actual cost of a gallon of gas is $10: $4 we pay at the pump, plus another $6 in taxes that subsidize the oil industry in various ways. If oil prices rise and cause a 20% increase in the actual cost of gas ($2), that has to be passed on to consumers at the pump, where it manifests as a 50% increase in pump prices ($4 + $2 = $6).
Since virtually all businesses have profit models and quarterly projections that are heavily influenced (directly or indirectly) by expectations of how gas prices will fluctuate, this increased volatility translates directly to more unstable markets and (surprise!) a weaker economy.
By removing the benefits for oil companies the tax payers are subsidizing, and giving the money back to tax payers, we create a more balanced market. Sure, the oil companies will have to drastically raise pump prices, but the actual cost to consumers won't change at all (we just pay for gas using the money we save in taxes). And you can bet the increased pump prices will have a wonderful effect on consumer demand for more efficient vehicles and alternate fuel sources.
Let's see, if I spend just 10 minutes a day discussing/thinking/worrying about this issue, that's 5 hours a month, times a nominal hourly rate of $75/hour = $375/month. Heck, that's ~8X what I pay for gas in a month - problem solved!
so... you never drive more than 2 miles?
of course Americans are lazy... just look around at how many ways we want to loose weights without doing what's required (eat less and exercise more).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MVwL2PcCG8
as an european I am glad to export all sort off reneeable energie to YOU
- now an in the future -
New McCain slogan: "Drain America First!"
The only way we can become energy independent is to invest in local renewable resources. Yes, gas is high, but not as high as it is in Europe, and they're doing ok. We can coast on what we have until we get more renewable energy sources. The current gas "crunch" is actually having a lot of positive effects as far as getting Americans off their asses about conservation.
(USD per Gallon)
UK: 8.57
France: 8.37
Germany: 8.53
kinda makes our 4.13 seem not so bad.
Add a comment: