Spolsky/Scoble workplace fracas

Saturday 18 June 2005This is 18 years old. Be careful.

Joel Spolsky and Robert Scoble have managed to get into a “did too”/”did not” about whether Microsoft is a good place to work or not. I saw it through Damien’s summary and thoughts on the matter, so you might as well start there.

Scoble’s points are good ones: big companies with lots of power and money can do lots of cool things that small companies cannot. And the cool Microsoft things Scoble links to do sound really cool (except the Hummer). But in my experience, the coolest of those things happen to a vanishingly small fraction of the company’s workforce. At the end of the day, what matters is how you actually spent your eight or ten or twelve hours of work. I vastly prefer small companies, because I can personally have a larger impact on the organization, and there are fewer inefficiencies in my way day-to-day. Some would dismiss it as being a big fish in a small pond, but I like it better than being a small fish in a big pond (or as a friend who is in the process of being assimilated by the Microsoft borg put it, “a guppy in an ocean”).


Or a big fish in a *big enough to matter* pond. If you're successfully delivering, it doesn't matter how small you are.
I think the hummer with the computer, gps, and big-screen TV in the back is entirely awesome.

Add a comment:

Ignore this:
Leave this empty:
Name is required. Either email or web are required. Email won't be displayed and I won't spam you. Your web site won't be indexed by search engines.
Don't put anything here:
Leave this empty:
Comment text is Markdown.