Thursday 21 November 2002 — This is over 20 years old. Be careful.
I take a lot of pictures with my digital camera, and have struggled with how to manage the images on my computer. I’ve used two different programs, and they are both good in their own ways, but they are also very different.
ThumbsPlus is a very full-featured program that has all the bells and whistles you could want when slinging images around. It handles batch conversions, color management, thumbnail generation, metadata, overlays, image querying, and so on and so on. It is a classic example of a feature-stuffed program with a usable, competent interface. The hallmark of this sort of program is the options dialog box, with multiple tabs and tons of checkboxes.
Picasa is very different: it is aimed the “home” user, meaning less-sophisticated. The entire design of Picasa is structured around a simple metaphor that home users will understand: you don’t work with files, you work with images organized chronologically into “albums”. Picasa has put a lot of effort into a very attractive interface (“attractive” not just in the sense of “pretty”, but in the sense of drawing you in). All of the visuals are very slick, with lots of sexy dynamic effects. These are the sorts of things Mac users have become accustomed to, but we troglodytes on Windows don’t get enough of it. When dragging thumbnails around, the other thumbnails glide around to make room for their new neighbor; the “timeline” view shows an infinite timeline with stacks of photos, which you can drive along until you find the stack you want. Picasa doesn’t do much, but it does everything a “snapshot” user needs (store, view, print, email), and it does it well.
So to summarize: ThumbsPlus provides way more tools, in a relatively pedestrian way. Picasa does comparatively little, but with real flair. Take your pick.
Add a comment: