I finally came up with a way I like to create PyCairo drawings in a Jupyter notebook.

A few years ago I wrote here about how to draw Cairo SVG in a Jupyter notebook. That worked, but wasn’t as convenient as I wanted. Now I have a module that manages the PyCairo contexts for me. It automatically handles the displaying of SVG and PNG directly in the notebook, or lets me write them to a file.

The module is drawing.py.

The code looks like this (with a sample drawing copied from the PyCairo docs):

from drawing import cairo_context

def demo():
    with cairo_context(200, 200, format="svg") as context:
        x, y, x1, y1 = 0.1, 0.5, 0.4, 0.9
        x2, y2, x3, y3 = 0.6, 0.1, 0.9, 0.5
        context.scale(200, 200)
        context.set_line_width(0.04)
        context.move_to(x, y)
        context.curve_to(x1, y1, x2, y2, x3, y3)
        context.stroke()
        context.set_source_rgba(1, 0.2, 0.2, 0.6)
        context.set_line_width(0.02)
        context.move_to(x, y)
        context.line_to(x1, y1)
        context.move_to(x2, y2)
        context.line_to(x3, y3)
        context.stroke()
    return context

demo()

Using demo() in a notebook cell will draw the SVG. Nice.

The key to making this work is Jupyter’s special methods _repr_svg_, _repr_png_, and a little _repr_html_ thrown in also.

The code is at drawing.py. I created it so that I could play around with Truchet tiles:

Lately I’ve been posting Python tidbits on Twitter. It’s been fun finding things that people might not yet know, fitting them into a tweet, and giving them some energy.

People ask how I make them. I tried a few “make a code screenshot” sites at first, but wanted more control over how the images looked. Now I create the code shots in vim with a tweaked color scheme (shades-of-purple). This lets me do things like highlight specific words I want to draw attention to. Then I use the Mac screenshot tool to grab an image:

The font is Recursive Mono SemiCasual. Recursive is a lovely and lively variable font with a number of axes to play with, especially the Casual axis, which I’ve set to halfway between Linear and Casual. You can get it now on Google Fonts. I’d like to try using Semi-Mono, but vim only understands monospaced fonts.

Some people have asked about publishing these tidbits here on nedbatchelder.com also, but I’m not sure it’s worth the effort. Would it be helpful to have a page like this that collected them per-month or something? Or one tweet per page? Or just let them live on Twitter?

Python f-strings use a formatting mini-language, the same as the older .format() function. After the colon comes short specifications for how to format the value:

>>> word = "Hello"
>>> f"{word:/^20}"
'///////Hello////////'
>>> amt = 12345678
>> f"{amt:20,}"
'          12,345,678'

Datetimes can use strftime syntax:

>>> f"{now:%Y-%m on day %d}"
'2022-04 on day 14'

The reason datetime uses different formatting specs than strings is because datetime defines its own __format__ method. Any object can define its own formatting mini-language. F-strings and .format() will use the __format__ method on an object, and pass it the formatting directives being used:

>>> class Confused:
...     def __format__(self, fmt):
...         return f"What is {fmt}?"
...
>>> c = Confused()
>>> f"{c:xyz12}"
'What is xyz12?'

Of course, __format__ can be used for more useful formatting than Confused is doing...

Geographic latitude and longitude are conventionally presented in a few different formats: degrees; or degrees and minutes; or degrees, minutes and seconds. Then the numbers can have varying number of decimal places, and sometimes the units are represented by symbols.

Here’s an implementation of those possibilities in __format__. The format string starts with “d”, “dm”, or “dms” to indicate the basic format. The number of decimal places can be specified with “.N”. Finally, symbols can be added, either plain or fancy, by adding a quote or minute symbol:

import dataclasses, re

@dataclasses.dataclass
class LatLong:
    lat: float
    long: float

    def __format__(self, fmt):
        dms, nfmt, opts = re.fullmatch(r"(dm?s?)([.\d]*)([′']?)", fmt).groups()
        formatted = []
        for num in [self.lat, self.long]:
            parts = []
            for ms in dms[1:]:
                parts.append(str(int(num)))
                num = abs((num - int(num)) * 60)
            parts.append(format(num, nfmt + "f"))
            syms = None
            if "'" in opts:
                syms = "°'\""
            elif "′" in opts:
                syms = "°′″"
            if opts:
                parts = [p + s for p, s in zip(parts, syms)]
            formatted.append(" ".join(parts))
        joined = ", ".join(formatted)
        return joined

>>> where = LatLong(42.359764937, -71.092068768)
>>> print(f"Location: {where:d'}")
Location: 42.359765°, -71.092069°
>>> print(f"Location: {where:d.4}")
Location: 42.3598, -71.0921
>>> print(f"Location: {where:dm'}")
Location: 42° 21.585896', -71° 5.524126'
>>> print(f"Location: {where:dms.4'}")
Location: 42° 21' 35.1538", -71° 5' 31.4476"
>>> print(f"Location: {where:dms.4}")
Location: 42 21 35.1538, -71 5 31.4476
>>> print(f"Location: {where:dms.6′}")
Location: 42° 21′ 35.153773″, -71° 5′ 31.447565″
>>> print("There: {:dms.6′}".format(where))
There: 42° 21′ 35.153773″, -71° 5′ 31.447565″
>>> print(format(where, "dms.6′"))
42° 21′ 35.153773″, -71° 5′ 31.447565″

This implementation doesn’t handle errors properly, but shows the basic idea. Also, lat/long are often shown with N/S E/W instead of positive and negative values. That’s left as an exercise for the reader.

Design patterns are a great way to think about interactions among classes. But the classic Singleton pattern is bad: you shouldn’t use it and there are better options.

The classic Singleton pattern is a class which always gives you the same object when you create an instance of the class. It’s used to ensure that all users of a class are using the same object.

The first problem with Singleton is that it encourages you to mix together two different ideas into one class. The first idea is whatever your class is about. Let’s say you are writing a chess game. Your ChessBoard class should only be concerned with chess-board-ness. A separate second idea is that your program only needs one board. That’s not a fact intrinsic to chess boards, so it shouldn’t be coded into your ChessBoard class.

If your program only needs one of a certain object, you can just make one:

class ChessBoard:
    def __init__(self):
        ...

the_chess_board = ChessBoard()

If you want centralized management of the instance, use a function to manage a global:

_the_chess_board = None

def the_chess_board():
    global _the_chess_board
    if _the_chess_board is None:
        _the_chess_board = ChessBoard()
    return _the_chess_board

Or let functools do it for you:

@functools.cache        # new in 3.9
def the_chess_board():
    return ChessBoard()

If you still really want the class to manage a single instance, you can shift that function to be a classmethod:

class ChessBoard:
    def __init__(self):
        ...

    @classmethod
    @functools.cache
    def the_board(cls):
        return cls()

These ways are simpler than the usual gymnastics to implement singletons. They have the additional benefit that the users of the class clearly understand that they are accessing a global instance. This is another problem with Singleton: it gives you a class that lies. Calling the class looks like you are making new objects, but you are not.

These ways also let you still make new instances when you need to. Your ChessBoard tests will need to create many instances to keep your tests isolated from each other. The Singleton pattern makes this difficult and requires even more tricky machinations.

But I just need one!

So just make one. There’s no reason to complicate the class by adding Singleton enforcement to it.

But I need it everywhere in my code!

OK, use the_chess_board() wherever you were using ChessBoard().

But I still want a way to enforce “just one!”

The function manages the global instance. Why does it have to happen inside the class? You should separate the concept of what the class is from the idea that there should be only one.

But someone might make more instances!

Who? Document the right way to use the class. Make it clear and easy to do it the right way, and then let it be. You can’t defend against every bug, and it’s their program anyway.

But I thought globals were bad?

They are bad, but your Singleton was also a global: there was only one for the whole process, and it could be changed from anywhere. It wasn’t literally a Python global variable, but it had all the same bad qualities, just hidden behind some tricky meta-programming. If you’re going to have a global, be up-front about it.

But what about None and things like it?

True, some immutable value types can be singletons, but that’s not how people use the Singleton pattern, and how often are you writing a class like None?

But Singleton is in the Design Patterns book!

That doesn’t mean it’s a good idea. None of the examples in the book are true Singletons, they are all examples of programs that just happen to need only one instance. And the Design Patterns book was never meant to be prescriptive: it’s not telling you what to do, it’s describing what people have done.

Dinghy is a tool I wrote to summarize activity on GitHub issues and pull requests. You configure it to look at certain GitHub resources over a recent time period, and it produces a compact digest of what’s been happening:

I started dinghy because I needed a way to see disparate activity in repos at work, and it’s been useful for that. So far it has the features I’ve needed. Maybe others will find it useful too.

It was also a chance to dig into the GitHub GraphQL API. GraphQL syntax is oddly strict (why can’t I define a fragment that isn’t used?), and GitHub’s implementation has quirks (sometimes requesting data with the wrong token scope is an error, other times it returns None). I can see the advantage of being able to request a graph of data with one request rather than a REST API that forces me to walk the graph myself, but paginating along multiple axes is still a pain (listing issues, and also comments on issues).

The code is still a mess in some places, and I haven’t figured out how to test most of it. But it was interesting to reverse engineer how GitHub decides on the text color for labels (they compute it in CSS!)

This blog is 20 years old today. My first post ever was My first job ever. 20 years later, this is my 2545th post.

It’s tempting to write a philosophical piece about the meaning of it all, and provide some grand perspective. But there is no overarching narrrative to this blog. It’s just been a place to write things and connect with people in various ways.

Here are some popular deep cuts you might have missed over the years:

• 2005: Myst island birthday cake: the most famous of the many family cakes we’ve made.
• 2006: Sue and Ned’s Excellent Adventure: dinner at the White House with the President.
• 2008: CSS Homer, animated: a goofy exploration of what is possible.

Often I write about what’s going on with my autistic son Nat:

• 2016: Walks in the morning: giving him what he needs when situations change.
• 2018: A complicated weekend: the struggle is real.
• 2018: Money for cotton candy: it’s not all struggle.

Of course, there’s lots of Python and other technical stuff:

• 2015: Python Names and Values
• 2019: Why your mock doesn’t work

Looking back 20 years at the early posts, many of the things I liked and linked to are gone. But for whatever reason, the puzzle-makers, geometers and type designers seem most durable. Here are some that are still around (and mostly look their age!):

• Clickmazes: online mazes and puzzles.
• Tom Van Vleck is a computing old-timer, a few decades more than me!
• Xaos is a great Mandelbrot viewer.
• Luc Devroye’s Type pages: many many many links about type.
• Letterhead Fonts: vintage-looking type for sale.
• Bill Cutler Puzzles: physical put-together puzzles.
• Omniglot: the online encyclopedia of writing systems and languages.
• TwistyPuzzles: an overwhelming variety of Rubiks-like twisty puzzles.

I’m not sure what else to say about 20 years of blogging. I’m still doing it.